Is Giving Cash a Better Solution for Poverty?

By
Marcelo Fernandez-Gonzalez
1 min read
⚠️ Heads up: this article is from our "experimental era" — a beautiful mess of enthusiasm ✨, caffeine ☕, and user-submitted chaos 🤹. We kept it because it’s part of our journey 🛤️ (and hey, everyone has awkward teenage years 😅).

Two surprising facts about welfare and poverty in the United States: substantial spending on the bottom earners, but inefficacy in fulfilling human needs. If all the money spent on anti-poverty programs was given directly to poor families, poverty could be eliminated. The shortcomings of the current system, including the substitution of in-kind benefits for labor income and the overlooked effectiveness of cash support, are brought to light. The potential for cash transfers as a viable solution is emphasized.

You May Also Like

This article is submitted by our user under the News Submission Rules and Guidelines. The cover photo is computer generated art for illustrative purposes only; not indicative of factual content. If you believe this article infringes upon copyright rights, please do not hesitate to report it by sending an email to us. Your vigilance and cooperation are invaluable in helping us maintain a respectful and legally compliant community.

Subscribe to our Newsletter

Get the latest in enterprise business and tech with exclusive peeks at our new offerings

We use cookies on our website to enable certain functions, to provide more relevant information to you and to optimize your experience on our website. Further information can be found in our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Service . Mandatory information can be found in the legal notice