Ukraine War Marks Three Years as US Pushes Ceasefire Deal Trading Territory for Critical Minerals

By
Thomas Schmidt
5 min read

Ukraine-Russia War: Is the Endgame Finally Here?

Three Years of War: A Crossroads for Ukraine and Global Stability

February 24, 2025, marks three years since Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine—a conflict that has redefined global geopolitics, reshaped supply chains, and tested the resilience of alliances. Over the past few weeks, diplomatic maneuvering has intensified, with the U.S. and European leaders signaling shifts in approach, while battlefield dynamics continue to evolve. As major players recalibrate their strategies, investors and businesses are closely watching how this war’s outcome will impact global energy markets, defense sectors, and economic stability.


The Power Struggle: Who Really Calls the Shots?

1. The U.S. Plan: Peace or a Strategic Business Deal?

The Biden administration had maintained robust support for Ukraine, but with Donald Trump’s return to office, the narrative has shifted. Washington has ramped up back-channel negotiations with Moscow, bypassing Ukraine and key European allies in some discussions. According to sources familiar with the talks, the Trump administration is aiming for a ceasefire before April 20, 2025, coinciding with Orthodox Easter.

One of the most controversial aspects of these talks is the U.S. proposal for Ukraine to exchange access to its critical mineral resources—valued at over $500 billion—for sustained American security guarantees. This move could provide U.S. firms privileged access to Ukraine’s lithium, uranium, and rare earth reserves, all vital for the clean energy and defense industries. However, Kyiv remains resistant, with President Volodymyr Zelensky arguing that economic sovereignty is as crucial as territorial integrity.

2. A Divided Europe: How Long Can the Alliance Hold?

While the European Union has largely presented a united front in supporting Ukraine, internal divisions are becoming more apparent. Italy and Slovakia have openly questioned continued military assistance, with Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni hinting at the need for “realistic peace terms.” Meanwhile, Germany and France are pushing for sustained military support, emphasizing the long-term risks of appeasement.

Despite official commitments, European aid to Ukraine is slowing. NATO pledged over €50 billion in military assistance for 2024, yet only about 60% has been delivered. Defense analysts point to stockpile limitations and political fatigue as contributing factors. The UK has announced its largest-ever sanctions package against Russia, but it is unclear whether this will have a significant impact given Moscow’s ability to redirect trade through China, India, and the Middle East.

3. Russia’s Resilience: Why Sanctions Aren’t Breaking Moscow

Despite heavy sanctions, Russia has weathered the economic storm better than many anticipated. The ruble remains volatile, but Moscow’s pivot toward alternative trade routes has mitigated the worst effects of Western restrictions. China, Iran, and North Korea have stepped in as key suppliers of critical goods, from semiconductors to military hardware.

On the battlefield, Russian forces have steadily expanded their control over parts of Donetsk and Luhansk, while maintaining defensive lines in the south. Analysts believe that Russia’s ability to sustain its war economy—thanks to strong oil and gas revenues—is a key factor in prolonging the conflict.

4. Canada’s Billion-Dollar Gamble: Can It Tip the Scales?

Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau has committed to a $5 billion military aid package, including light armored vehicles and fighter jet training simulators. NATO, in the meantime, has begun training a new Ukrainian military brigade, with Norway and the Baltic states leading the initiative. While these measures bolster Ukraine’s capabilities, they fall short of reversing Russian territorial gains.


Where Should Investors Put Their Money?

1. The Energy Tug-of-War: Will Oil Prices Stay Volatile?

Despite multiple rounds of sanctions, Russia continues to export energy, primarily through India and China. Oil prices have remained volatile, hovering between $80 and $90 per barrel, with potential price spikes if further sanctions target Russian exports. European natural gas prices, though stable compared to the 2022 crisis, remain sensitive to further escalations.

For investors, this means ongoing uncertainty in energy markets. LNG (liquefied natural gas) investments are surging, particularly in U.S. and Qatari projects, as Europe continues to diversify away from Russian gas.

2. The War Profiteers: Defense Stocks Are Booming

The prolonged war has triggered a global boom in defense spending. Lockheed Martin, Rheinmetall, and BAE Systems have all seen substantial stock gains, reflecting increased demand for weaponry, particularly air defense systems and armored vehicles. Expect further contract awards as NATO nations replenish depleted stockpiles.

3. Ukraine’s Rebuild: A Land of Opportunity or a Money Pit?

Despite the ongoing war, investment in Ukraine’s future reconstruction has begun. The European Investment Bank and private equity firms are already strategizing post-war development, with a focus on infrastructure, energy, and technology. However, any large-scale investment remains contingent on a stable ceasefire.

Ukraine’s ability to retain control over its critical industries will define its post-war economic trajectory. If the U.S.-proposed resource deal materializes, American firms will have first-mover advantages in Ukraine’s mining and energy sectors.


The Endgame: How Does This War Conclude?

1. A U.S.-Russia Brokered Ceasefire (The Most Likely Outcome, But at What Cost?)

  • Ukraine potentially cedes contested territories in exchange for NATO security assurances.
  • U.S. secures privileged access to Ukrainian critical minerals.
  • Russia retains its territorial gains but faces long-term economic stagnation.

2. A Never-Ending War (Can Ukraine Sustain the Fight?)

  • Continued fighting drains both Ukraine and Russia economically.
  • Western aid remains inconsistent, exacerbating uncertainty.
  • Market volatility persists, particularly in energy and commodities.

3. A European-Led Peace Initiative (A Long Shot, But Not Impossible)

  • France and Germany push for an EU-driven settlement.
  • Security guarantees replace immediate NATO membership.
  • Russia and Ukraine engage in long-term frozen conflict negotiations.

What Comes Next? The World Watches Closely

The war in Ukraine is no longer just about battlefield gains—it has become a test case for the future of global order. For investors, geopolitical risk is now a defining factor across industries, from energy and defense to technology and rare earth mining.

As diplomatic efforts accelerate, the biggest question remains: will Ukraine be forced into a deal that trades sovereignty for survival? The answer to that will shape not just Eastern Europe, but the broader balance of power for years to come.

You May Also Like

This article is submitted by our user under the News Submission Rules and Guidelines. The cover photo is computer generated art for illustrative purposes only; not indicative of factual content. If you believe this article infringes upon copyright rights, please do not hesitate to report it by sending an email to us. Your vigilance and cooperation are invaluable in helping us maintain a respectful and legally compliant community.

Subscribe to our Newsletter

Get the latest in enterprise business and tech with exclusive peeks at our new offerings